Lucid Dreams and Saturn Skies The Life and Writing of Andrew Kincaid

Tag Archives: Torture Porn

A Horror Review Two-fer–The Human Centipede I and II

The Human Centipede, directed by Tom Six

“Their flesh is his fantasy”

Those who have read my blog for awhile now know that I have a distaste for the torture porn sub-genre–in my experience, most of them are little more than plot-less excuses to sling a bunch of gore and body parts at a camera array.  Like the exploitation films of the seventies onward, they’re all style and no substance but with one difference; namely, they trade style for something akin to blunt force trauma.  While exploitation films could be goofy fun, the cinematic equivalent of a Twinkie, torture porn often lacks the wink and nod toward the audience and instead focuses on showing the inner workings of the human anatomy as explicitly as possible.

…in light of that last sentence I should once again define torture porn.  It’s not actual pornography, but rather it is called torture porn because it features explicit displays of violence and torture.  Think movies like Saw (which is actually quite a good film…the later ones not so much) and Hostel (never seen it).  I’ve touched on the topic before in my review of the abominable film Philosophy of a Knife.

With all of that in mind, you’ll understand why I put off seeing The Human Centipede for as long as I did.  This is one of those movies that people talk about in whispers, a movie that teenagers at sleep overs challenge each other to sit through without gagging.  That sort of thing.  Being that I tend to at least half pay attention to what goes on in the horror genre, I knew the entire premise of the movie: a German surgeon grafts three hapless tourists together end to end forming the titular Human Centipede.  Certainly a disgusting thing, considering the mechanics of their shared digestion, but I didn’t see how it was a concept that could carry an entire movie.  Plus, I’d heard that it was an abominably bad film from reviewers and a few people I knew who had seen it.

Still, the damned thing kept popping up on Netflix until my curiosity got the better of me and I finally watched it.  I knew The Human Centipede would be bad, but I couldn’t have expected it to be anywhere near as bad as it was.  There was no plot to speak of, just a bunch of stuff happening to pad out the length of the movie to an agonizing hour and a half.  When the Human Centipede was finally revealed, it really didn’t live up to the build up.  Maybe for people first seeing the movie, but not two or three years after it was made.  Plus, it didn’t help that the director couldn’t be bothered to develop his characters.  Had he done so, their plight would have been more disturbing.  Don’t get me wrong–the entire concept is disturbing.  But the movie lacks any kind of impact other than the gag factor because there is not any character development.  Rather than actual people, the victims of the mad doctor’s surgery are little more than the cinematic equivalent of cardboard cut outs.

That lack of character development led to one of the two things I found surprising about The Human Centipede.  The first was that the movie was boring.  Oh my good Lord was it boring!  Forty-five minutes in I felt like I’d been sitting there for two hours.  Both the lack of plot and the lack of any sort of characterization sucked any tension out of what could have been quite an intense movie.  Only one scene made me feel tense, and that was the crawling chase scene where the lead guy of the Human Centipede, a random Japanese guy, disabled the mad doctor and led an escape attempt.

“100% medically INaccurate”

The other bit that surprised me was the amount of restraint the director showed when it came to gore.  There was surprisingly little of it, despite the premise of the film.  That might have been a disappointment for the gore-hounds out there, but I was impressed.  But that feeling quickly dissipated when I decided to subject myself to The Human Centipede 2, where Tom Six more than made up for the lack.

You might ask me why I watched the second movie if I didn’t like the first.  I’m not sure I have an answer for that, other than that I’m a glutton for punishment.  If the first Human Centipede was terrible, the second was absolutely abysmal.  HC2 featured a bug-eyed recluse obsessed with the original The Human Centipede.  That’s right–HC2 takes place in the “real” world, where apparently someone liked The Human Centipede enough to try and reenact it.

…it only gets worse from there.  You might be asking how that’s possible, but believe me it is.  I’m not even sure what to say about HC2, other than that it is completely disgusting, stupid, and reprehensible.  The amount of gore in the movie isn’t quite cartoonish, but it is nearly so.  While HC1 tried to build tension and strike you with the horror of the scenario its characters found itself in, HC2 dropped all pretenses and became pure torture porn.  But it’s all filmed in black and white, so it’s artsy (that’s how that works, right?).  I think Tom Six attempted to top himself with HC2, and he certainly did but not how he intended.  He proved that you could make a movie even more boring, stupid, and offensive than The Human Centipede.  No mean feat, that.

Do you ever find yourself watching a movie you know is going to be awful in spite of yourself?  Have you seen either of these movies, and if so what did you think?


Philosophy of a Knife (2008)

Philosophy of a Knife is a shock film by Andrey Iskanov, chronicling the atrocities of Unit 731 during WW2.

“God Created Heaven. Man Created Hell.”

Last night, I did something that I don’t normally do.  I watched what is purported by some to be among the most shocking horror movies ever made.  Now, as I said, I don’t normally try those kind of movies.  Don’t get me wrong, I like horror and I won’t shy away from a horror movie that shows blood and brutality, only so long as the blood, brutality, and breasts aren’t the sole focus of the film.  There has to be at least something resembling a story and likable characters for me to get into a movie – the three B’s of torture-porn are secondary to me.

…I should explain what I mean when I say “torture-porn”.  No, I’m not talking about actual pornography.  Torture-porn is a sub-genre of horror that focuses almost exclusively on gore and violence – the more over the top, the better.  Examples of the genre that general audiences might be familiar with are Saw and Hostel.  I suppose you could also call the genre “shock”, as the entire point is to shock and appall the audience.

Philosophy of a Knife is just such a movie, although the director (Andrey Iskanov) tries to pass it off as a documentary.  The movie is meant to shine a spotlight on the atrocities committed by Unit 731, a unit of the Japanese army that researched biological and chemical weapons technology among other things during the Second World War.  Unit 731 committed atrocities in their pursuit of knowledge, such as infecting prisoners of war with bubonic plague or other pathogens and using live prisoners to test the limits of human physical endurance under conditions of extreme heat, cold, or pressure.  Some people suffered vivisection, which is essentially an autopsy performed while the victim was alive. These crimes aren’t well known for a variety of reasons, not the least of which because they were perpetrated against Russians, Chinese, and Koreans, and because they were overshadowed by the sheer scale of Nazi atrocities.

This is a story that needs to be told – what was done to the victims of Unit 731 was awful, and those who did it need to be held accountable, by history at least if not the courts.  However, Philosophy of a Knife takes a subject worthy of an extensive documentary treatment and exploits it to make what amounted to a crappy, low budget torture-porn flick.

Philosophy of a Knife is a 4 hour long movie, divided into two parts, that alternates supposed archive footage including stills and film reels with recreations of the horrors perpetrated against prisoners.  The movie was shot in grainy black and white.  It’s poorly edited, and it spends long (really long!) minutes showing snow fall, exterior shots, and people marching or walking down hallways.  The music and sound effects are meant to be industrial and to add an air of menace to the movie.  They don’t.  They’re grating.  The movie feels like a cross between a Nine Inch Nails video and a David Lynch film.

And the acting…oy the acting!  I’ve seen people show more distress standing in line at Wal-Mart than these people did supposedly walking to their executions!  Seriously.  These folks were stoic as monks as they walked to their inevitable and incredibly painful deaths.

Oh and about the actors.  Apparently, Andrey Iskanov believed that the Japanese only performed their experiments on Russian supermodels because those were the only people he hired.  In the interest of history, I’d like to point out that most of the victims were Korean and Chinese, with a smattering of other nationalities thrown in, including American POWS.  Approximately 580,000 people were murdered in the gruesome experiments the unit carried out, some in the actual facilities and others during field tests of biological and chemical weapons.

And now to the most disgusting part of this film – the recreations.  These were meant to show in gruesome detail the experiments that the Japanese staff conducted on prisoners.  Now, I can’t comment on later parts of the film because I only made it an hour into this turd, but the section I saw had a few scenes of the torture.

Shiro Ishii, commander of Unit 731

Ishii, architect of death. He was the commander of Unit 731.

How do I not sound like a monster here?  The scenes didn’t have an effect on me.  At all.  Mind you, I may be hardened from watching and reading a lot of horror, but I still cringe at movies like Saw, Se7en, and some zombie movies.  I’m not an ice man, and I’m certainly not jaded.  The scenes in Philosophy of a Knife were almost laughable because the special effects were so lousy, especially for a movie made in 2008.  If there was supposed to be some sort of great emotional gut punch from the recreations, it was lost on me.

The recreations weren’t disgusting (only) because of their content, but because of what they were meant to exploit – the very real suffering that real people experienced at the hands of the Japanese over sixty years ago.  Most disgusting of all, the movie was dedicated both to the victims and their executioners.  Andrey Iskanov should be ashamed of himself for exploiting a subject that should be given a serious documentary treatment by making it a movie that attempts to be both a schlocky gore flick and an art film, while failing miserably at both.  Judging by the pretension oozing from this movie, I doubt shame is an emotion this guy is capable of feeling.  Do yourself a favor and ignore this turd.

For more information about Unit 731 than you’d learn in the film, check out Wikipedia. 


%d bloggers like this: