Lucid Dreams and Saturn Skies The Life and Writing of Andrew Kincaid

Tag Archives: Religion

Proof of Hell Under the Siberian Tundra? …or Not.

The Kola Superdeep Borehole, putative site of the gateway to hell, now welded shut due to lack of funding. Image Credit: Rakot13

The Kola Superdeep Borehole, putative site of the gateway to hell, now welded shut due to lack of funding. Image Credit: Rakot13

It was the mid-1980′s, and the Cold War was still going strong. America had won the Space Race with the triumphant moon landings of the sixties and seventies. Now the superpowers  competed to pioneer a new space — the one beneath our feet.

To achieve those ends, the Soviet Union commissioned a deep drilling project in the icy wastes of Siberia. A team of geologists drilled about 14.4 kilometers (about 9 miles) beneath the Earth’s surface, when something strange happened — the bit started to spin wildly, and temperature sensors recorded temperatures over 2,000 degrees. No doubt baffled, the scientists lowered a mic down the well shaft to get a better idea of what they were dealing with. What they heard horrified them (the sounds start at about the 2:00 mark) and confirmed people’s worst fears for centuries; that Hell was real, and it lay right beneath our feet!

…er, except not.

This one is pretty classic in terms of urban legends. It isn’t exactly certain where the story began, and it has been elaborated on extensively over time. I remember seeing lurid headlines in the Weekly World News as a kid in the 90′s talking about the Devil coming screaming out of a well to hell drilled in Alaska, incinerating all the unfortunate scientists at the site and spreading doom and gloom all around. The story freaked me out as a kid, as the one-two punch of being A) a kid and B) a Bible literalist tends to make one a bit credulous. Even as a teen, hearing the clip featured in the above video scared the crap out of me.

Evidently a lot of people feel the same way, because this one still makes the rounds on paranormal and religious sites of all kinds. And why not? If Hell really did exist in a real, physical place, that would be a really scary thing. It would confirm many people’s worst anxieties about the after life and their potential place in it. It would also raise some pretty uncomfortable moral and theological implications, which we won’t get into here. The point is that Hell is scary, and that fear is what gives this urban legend (and most others while we’re at it) its staying power.

Needless to say, it isn’t true. The recording is believed to be a looped recording of a scene from the B-grade horror flick Baron Blood. To me it almost sounds like it could be a doctored recording of any public space, looped and made to sound all sinister. There is a small kernel of truth behind this sordid tale, as is the case with most good urban legends. There really was a deep drilling well that reached close to 9 miles underground in Soviet Russia. It was located on the Kola Peninsula, not in Siberia. The drill did hit an empty pocket, but there were no hellish sounds from within. Temperatures reached a toasty 180 degrees, and the geologists found water and natural gas, among other things of scientific interest.

The truth is a whole lot less exciting than a literal gateway to hell, but being the compassionate sort I’d rather that be the fact than to have millions of people suffering and burning forever.

The Georgia Guidestones–America’s Stonehenge

The Chinese and Arabic inscriptions on the Georgia Guidestones.

Set among rolling green hills, a strange granite structure rises up from the surrounding woods and farmland.  It is composed of huge, granite slabs covered in a cryptic message that is related in eight different languages.  The entire structure is configured to a precise astronomical alignment: a slot in the capstone tracks movement of the sun throughout the year, a hole in the capstone marks the noon hour, and a channel carved in the stone points to the celestial pole.  This strange monument has attracted attention from conspiracy theorists and religious authorities alike for its strange message to posterity.

From it’s description, you might be thinking that this monument is located in some ancient land; England, or perhaps deep in Romania or the Ukraine.  You would be wrong; it is located right here in the good ole United States of America, specifically in the state of Georgia.  Hence its name–the Georgia Guidestones, also known as “America’s Stonehenge”.

The Guidestones were commissioned in June of 1979 by a man under the pseudonym R.C. Christian, who hired the Elberton Granite Finishing Company to do the work.  Nobody knows the real identity of R.C. Christian, but if the inscription “Let these be guidestones to an Age of Reason” is any indication, the motivation behind the monument was clear enough.  The Guidestones bear ten principles to achieve this end, engraved in granite in eight modern languages: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian.  The principles are as follows:

  1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
  2. Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
  3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
  4. Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
  5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
  6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
  7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
  8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
  9. Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
  10. Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

It’s pretty easy to see why there is controversy around the Guidestones, considering that it says we should maintain the global population at a small fraction of its current level.  It also has fairly controversial ideas about national sovereignty, calling for not only a global language but a one world government and, apparently, a shared global spirituality.  Proponents of traditional religion naturally are going to be against these ideas.  In researching this post I read a rather hysterical article by a minister who claimed that the Guidestones were the blueprint of the New World Order.  Not exactly a rational response there, especially considering nobody seems to be chomping at the bit to enact these principles at the moment.

While it’s hard to say for certain what R.C. Christian intended with his Guidestones, I think it’s important to take the timing of the construction in context.  The Cold War was still on, and a nuclear war between the Superpowers was a very real possibility.  Maybe Christian’s intention was not for his principles to be implemented in our time but in a post apocalyptic future when the population of the human race would be greatly reduced and civilization was on the brink of collapse, if not already over the edge.  It was probably meant to be a guide to build a better civilization, one that would be less likely to destroy itself than our own.

Or, it could have simply been a gimmick to bring tourists to Elbert County.  Maybe.  The only one who really knows is R.C. Christian, and he doesn’t seem to be talking these days.

A Prometheus Inspired Ramble on the Origins of Life (Oh, and There’s a Movie Review in There Too)

Prometheus, a prequel to Alien directed by Ridley Scott

“They went looking for our beginning. What they found could be our end”

Normally I don’t do reviews of new movies.  And, strictly speaking, this isn’t going to be a review.  The first part will be, but the second part will be me rambling about science stuff brought to mind by said movie.  Prometheus was billed as a psuedo-sequel to Alien.  Being a fan of Alien, I knew that when Prometheus came into theaters I would go to see it.  I wasn’t particularly optimistic as to how good it would be, and so I was pleasantly surprised when the movie sucked me in and didn’t let me go until the end of its run time.  Prometheus is a hauntingly beautiful and deeply engrossing film, showing off stark awe-inspiring visuals of a dead world.  The characters are fully realized and come to life on screen…

I could go on, but I won’t belabor the point.  My friend Amanda Rudd did an in depth review of the movie over on her blog, and she did a better job of it than I could.  No, instead I want to focus on the one quibble I had with the film.  Prometheus raises a lot of profound questions about life, religion, and the origins of humanity.  When the movie begins, we see a freakishly muscled humanoid alone on a barren, rocky world.  He watches a ship take off in the distance before taking a sip of some nasty tar-looking substance that starts to break him apart on a molecular level.  The nameless alien tumbles into the river where even his DNA breaks into pieces.  It’s never said with any certainty, but presumably this is the moment Earth is seeded with life.

You read that right.  Prometheus rewrites human history by introducing the concept that life was seeded by a species of alien beings called The Engineers.  The action of the movie centers around the crew of the ship Prometheus, who have been dispatched to an alien moon whose coordinates were found in ancient cave paintings and carvings the world over in order to ascertain whether The Engineers in fact exist and to see if any still live.  Those among other things–you’ll have to see the movie to find out the rest.

There is a scene near the beginning when the crew of Prometheus are brought out of hibernation and briefed on their mission.  And here comes the point when I got annoyed.  You see, there was a biologist among the crew.  It’s a smart thing to bring a biologist along to an alien world where you suspect there to be life since, after all, life is their forte.  However, this biologist was not a particularly good one.  When Dr. Elizabeth Shaw, played by the lovely Noomi Rapace, mentions the idea that The Engineers seeded the Earth with life, the biologist exclaims that such an idea would “overturn 300 years of Darwinism”.

In retrospect, that statement surprises me because of the intelligent manner in which Prometheus handles the many questions it raises (but never answers).  The biologist’s exclamation shows a very fundamental misunderstanding of both evolutionary theory and how scientific theories in general work, things any decent biologist should understand (but maybe not a script writer, although they should have done better research).

Charles Darwin, author of “On the Origin of Species”. His theory of evolution by natural selection revolutionized the science of biology and changed how people saw themselves in relation to the natural world.

The theory of evolution explains the diversity of life on Earth.  It’s a fairly complex theory, but on a basic level it’s pretty simple.  One of my favorite ways to define it is as follows: “the change in the frequency of alleles [expressed genes] over time”.  Basically, in a given population certain members of the species carry an array of genes that enhance their chances of survival.  Those more likely to survive can pass their favorable genes on to the next generation, and so on and so forth.  That’s a gross oversimplification, but for our purposes it will suffice because it points out the point I want to make.  Namely, evolutionary theory doesn’t comment at all on the origins of life!  It explains how the diversity we see in the biological world came to be, but it doesn’t explain how it started.

On the surface that may seem odd, but a quick look at the scientific use of the word theory should clear any confusion.  I did an entire post on this topic before, so I’ll be brief.  A scientific theory, in a basic sense, explains how something in nature works.  This is different from a fact, which is something that is consistently observed and held to be true.  Evolution has been observed in nature, established from fossil, morphological, and genetic evidence among other things.  It is a fact.  The theory of evolution explains how evolution works.  That is the nature of a scientific theory.

Now, one facet of a theory is that it has a range of validity.  As I said above, the theory of evolution explains the diversity of life, not its origins.  Evolutionary theory’s range of validity begins only after life begins, when there is something there for natural selection and other selective pressures to act upon.  In order to explain the origins of life, another theory is needed.  Currently, the big contender for the theory to explain the origins of life on Earth is called abiogenesis, which is a big fancy word that means that life came from non-life.  For the moment though, nobody is quite sure specifically how this process occurred, but the evidence is gaining and I imagine in our lifetime we will see DNA created from raw molecular materials.

But Prometheus doesn’t touch on abiogenesis.  Instead, it touches on an alternate hypothetical scenario by which life came to be on Earth called panspermia, specifically directed panspermia.  Panspermia means essentially that life came to Earth from somewhere else, probably by hitching  a ride on a comet or meteorite.  Directed panspermia is the idea that an alien species seeded Earth with the rudiments of life and then let evolution take its course, which is the premise behind Prometheus.  However, such an idea does not overturn Darwinism (I don’t like that word but we’ll go with it), although it is a fascinating thing to think about.  Who knows?  Maybe Prometheus is prescient and we will come to discover that all of us are really the descendents of beings from the sky.

Did you get a chance to see Prometheus?  What did yo think of it if you did?  How would it impact you if it turned out that life on our planet was seeded by an alien species? 


Bizarre Buddhism–Tibetan Sky Burials

Drigung Monastery

A photograph of Drigung Monastery, a site famous for performing sky burials.

The rites and rituals surrounding death can tell you a great deal about a culture: their religion, their values, and their general view of the world.  Some of the most famous funerary practices come out of ancient Egypt, namely Egyptian mummies.  The mummification ritual sprung out of a complex mythology that informed the entire Egyptian view of the universe.

In America, death is confined to the hospital, the hospice, and the nursing home.  An entire industry has sprung up around death in America and other Western countries, involving morticians, funeral homes, casket makers, and several other groups.  Often, the corpse is only glimpsed, if at all, during the wake and the funeral itself.  Morticians take pains to make the body appear as if it is in calm repose.  Once the funeral ceremony is over, the bereaved leave and the burial is performed by graveyard caretakers, out of sight of the family.

The arrangements vary according to religious and personal taste, and of course due to economic considerations as well.  For example, cremations are on the rise because on the whole they cost less than having to buy a burial plot, a casket, and a tombstone.  Still, most often Americans prefer burial in a cemetery.  This is no surprise given the strong Christian influence on our culture.  In Christianity, there is a pervading belief in bodily resurrection.  As Jesus himself was resurrected, so too will everyone who walked the Earth be resurrected into new bodies come Judgement Day (this of course varies by denomination and tradition–I’m simply generalizing for the sake of brevity).

As it is in America, so it is in Tibet.  The strong Buddhist tradition in that country influences its death rites, resulting in a funerary practice that to most Westerners would seem barbaric–the Tibetan Sky Burial.  Known as jhator in Tibet, it is a practice of ritual dissection wherein the body of the deceased is exposed to the elements and scavengers until their body is completely disposed of.

How precisely the ritual is performed varies depending on the economic status of the family of the deceased–it can be an expensive procedure, so sometimes the body is simply left exposed on a high rock shelf.  In other instances, the so-called “body-breakers” (rogyapas ) go about the process of ritual dissection after appropriate prayers have been performed by Buddhist monks.  How the dissections are performed can vary: sometimes the body-breakers allow vultures to feed on the body until only a skeleton remains, after which they take sledgehammers to the bones and pound them to dust.  The powder and pulp is mixed with flour and the whole mixture is fed to smaller birds.  Sometimes the body is stripped of flesh and the body parts spread around for the vultures to feast on before the pounding bones to dust part is done.

…pretty gruesome, right?  Why in the heck would anyone want to be disposed of this way, and why would a family allow it, much less come to witness it?  To understand the why’s, first we must look into who Tibetan Buddhists view life and death.  Tibetan Buddhists (and many others) believe in rebirth.  This is related to the cycle of samsara we discussed a bit in a previous entry in this series about Buddhist hell.  The deceased’s rebirth is determined by his or her karma.  So where does the body enter into this equation?

Well, it doesn’t.  Once the life is gone from a body, it’s nothing more than a lump of flesh.  The sky burial reflects this belief, and another deep belief held by Buddhists of all stripes–impermanence.  Buddhists do not believe in a bodily resurrection, nor in an eternal rest.  Nothing is eternal in Buddhism, save for maybe samsara itself and nirvana (but now’s not the time to go into all that!).  This life and our bodies are all impermanent.

There is another facet to the practice that might seem odd to Westerners.  Jhator is seen as an act of compassion on the part of the deceased and their family toward the birds that feed on his/her corpse, and toward the animals who would avoid being eaten because the vultures and other birds were sated from feasting on human flesh.  Indeed, sometimes these birds eat quite well for themselves.  Jhator is performed at designated charnal grounds, often near monasteries.  The largest ones can attract huge flocks of vultures, who must be fended off with sticks while the rituals are being performed.

A sky burial site

This is Yerpa Valley, a site designated for sky burials. Notice the barrenness of the land. Likely the locale as much as religion prompted Tibetans to adopt the practice of jhator.

Lest you think all of this (what we’d call over here) weirdness is for religious reasons, I must add that there are some very practical economic reasons to perform sky burials.  The Tibetan Plateau lay high in the Himalayas, above the tree line.  So, wood is scarce, and what little bit there is probably isn’t going to be used to perform a cremation.  Furthermore, the soil on the plateau is very rocky and in many places contains layers of permafrost, making burials impractical for all but the highest officials (some llamas or priests are given burials to honor their accomplishments).

Really, sky burials developed from practical economic concerns long before Buddhism came to Tibet–there’s some evidence to suggest that similar rituals occurred 11,500 years ago in that region. That does not mean of course that the religious aspect is any less important to the people of Tibet, any more than the religious aspect of our funerary rituals in the West are no less important due to economic factors.  People are people no matter where they live or what faith they practice.

Still, I’m thinking I’ll pass on having my body go to the birds.


Red State (2011)

Red State was a horror movie directed by Kevin Smith in 2011, that features a group of religous fanatics similar to Westboro Baptist who despise homosexuals.

“Love Thy Neighbor”

Netflix has broadened my horizons in terms of horror movies.  It has put hundreds, if not thousands, of them at my fingertips for only about $8 a month.  As a result, I’ve watched many movies I wouldn’t normally watch (and my trips to the local video store have trickled to a stop, something I feel kind of bad about since I know the people who own it).  Red State is one such movie; my friends and I watched it on a lark a few months ago, and last night I decided to give it a re-watch.

Red State is sort of a hybrid movie; not quite horror, but not fully a thriller, with hints of an action movie sprinkled throughout.  The story follows three horny teenagers looking to get their rocks off in small town America.  The three go out one night in pursuit of a fling with a woman one of them met on a casual sex site online.  What should have been a stupid teenage adventure turns horrific when the woman, who turns out to be a middle aged member of an extreme fundamentalist church called Five Points Trinity Church, drugs the boys.  The three are taken to the church’s compound, where the bulk of the movie unfolds.

The social commentary aspect of Red State is not subtle in the least.  The head of Five Points Trinity Church is Abin Cooper, an angry and charismatic fire and brimstone preacher who rails against the evils of modern America, especially homosexuality.  His flock seemed to mostly consist of his family, including several young grandchildren.  His flock protest military funerals, and in the beginning of the film they’re seen protesting the funeral of a homosexual teen who was recently murdered.

All of this may sound familiar if you’ve kept track of the news in the last ten years or so; Five Points Trinity is a pretty unsubtle nod to the real life crazies in Westboro Baptist, headed by Fred Phelps.  The Five Pointers go one step further, though; while Phelps and his ilk call for God to smite America for its sins, Abin Cooper’s group takes divine justice into their own hands.  The recently murdered teen?  You guessed it; Cooper’s group was responsible.  Another murder of a homosexual man is graphically depicted soon after the teenagers are captured and let me tell ya, it’s disturbing (although, during the commission of the crime there is a fairly humorous moment when one church member cautions another not to get any of the man’s saliva on him else he catch “the gay”.  I can’t help but feel that some people genuinely believe that).

After the murder, Red State takes a turn toward action movie territory, when the ATF performs a (botched) raid on The Five Pointer’s compound, after one member shot a sheriff’s deputy.  This is were the movie becomes weird(er), as John Goodman of all people shows up as an ATF agent heading up the raid.  While the church is despicable, the government doesn’t come off much better as the situation quickly devolves into something similar to Waco.  There is a great twist toward the end of the movie; I won’t give it away, but I would say it’s certainly ironic and I remember laughing later when everything came out.

Red State was, at least in my opinion, a good movie.  It certainly had its flaws; I almost would have rather seen the movie stick with the teens attempting to escape the church, more like a The Texas Chainsaw Massacre type scenario, rather than turn to the action flick that it became.  Be that as it may, the movie ends better than the original planned ending, where the honest to God, Biblical Armageddon began.  I think the movie would have been better served had it been a straight horror flick, as I said in TCM style.  But that wasn’t the director’s vision, and you have to respect what Kevin Smith managed to accomplish, despite the movie’s obvious problems.


Bizarre Buddhism–Buddhist Hell

An image of the Buddhist hells, as depicted on the cycle of samsara

Buddhist hell, depicted as a part of the Wheel of Life.

Hell.  The word conjures images of bat winged devils with pitchforks, stoking sinners in a fiery furnace of fire and brimstone.  At least, that’s the image we have in the West.  That isn’t the universal image of Hell though.  Buddhism has its own conception of an unpleasant after-life, although their conception differs quite a bit from that of Western religions.

For one thing, there isn’t really an “after-life”.  Life is a continuum, and death is nothing more than a transition from one state of being to another.  It is all life, just in a different way.  According to Buddhist cosmology there are six different realms of existence (Heaven, human, human, Asura, animal, and Hell).  Your karma determines which realm you are reborn into, and which subdivision within each realm.  There is no divine judgement – it’s simply a result of good or bad action.  A soul’s stay in each realm is temporary, determined by the amount of karma they have acquired by their actions in past lives.  Once that karma is used up, good or bad, the soul goes on to its next rebirth. The goal in Buddhism isn’t to get to Heaven or avoid Hell – it’s to get beyond the entire cycle of suffering and achieve Nirvana.

The realm of Hell is called Naraka, and there are two main subdivisions within it – Cold Naraka and Hot Naraka.  Each of the two main subdivisions are further divided into eight more subdivisions, with each one in each realm getting progressively worse.

Souls suffering in Cold Naraka

A painting of Cold Naraka, depicting souls suffering in the freezing weather. And trees, for some reason.

In Cold Naraka, the first level is called Arbuda.  It is a plain surrounded by icy mountains, that is constantly swept by blizzards and icy winds.  Souls are born into this realm fully grown and naked.  They wander around for the duration of their stay alone, and their skin is covered in blisters.  The next realm is called Nirarbuda, which is basically the same as the previous realm but colder.  It’s so cold that the blisters break and the person is covered in the puss and blood, which freezes to their bodies.

Realm three in cold Naraka is, well, I’m not sure how it’s more unpleasant than the other ones.  It’s called Atatata, or the Naraka of shivering.  The souls continually make at-at-at sounds as they shiver.  Sounds odd but weirdness and…creativity…are par for the course when it comes to this whole hell thing.  People get pretty creative when it comes to punishing people who wrong them, even if it’s an imaginary punishment.  Anyway, the next levels up from the shivering hell are similar, one where the people moan and lament their suffering and another where they chatter their teeth (you’d think all of this would be assumed in the first couple of cold Narakas but whatever).  After all the chattering and moaning, Uptala Naraka has the soul’s skin turning blue.  Finally, the last two levels of Cold Naraka are the most gruesome of the bunch.  In the next to last one, Padma, the skin freezes solid and cracks open.  The final and most horrible level sees the skin sloughing off, exposing the internal organs, which also freeze and crack.

Pretty nasty right? Things ramp up to downright horrific in the Hot Narakas though.  In the lowest level, the souls are born fully grown, naked, and in a state of fear and misery.  The first level has a floor of hot iron heated by a giant flame.  Yama (one version of the devil in Buddhism.  Mara is another) and his minions attack the souls and torture them in a variety of sadistic ways, including dripping molten metal onto their bare flesh and slicing them to pieces.  The truly diabolical nature of this realm though is that there is no escape – as soon as the soul ‘dies’ or comes close to fainting, they heal and the torture begins again.

A demon boiling souls alive in hot naraka

Well….that looks decidedly unpleasant…

In the next level up, the demons mark the soul with black lines which they cut along with fiery saws and axes.  Next comes the crushing Naraka, a particularly gruesome area where rocks crush the soul into jelly upon the red hot metal floor.  When the rocks roll away, the soul is reformed and the crushing begins again.  Next comes the screaming Naraka where the beings run around screaming (obviously), trying to escape the hot iron floor, but when they try to seek shelter they’re locked in and set on fire.

The next few are pretty closely related, although one is kind of a misnomer.  It’s called “piercing Naraka” but the souls are attacked by wild animals and ripped apart.  The next is “heated” Naraka, where the demons (who are presumably pretty busy) impale souls on fiery spears, and in the next level they use tridents for extra stabbiness.

The apex of Hell, and the pinnacle of suffering, might seem familiar to Christians.  It is a fiery furnace, an oven where souls are slowly roasted for the duration of their stay, with horrible suffering for all.

Whew…that’s some crazy stuff right?  I don’t believe that any of it is true, of course.  Probably the ideas of heaven and hell and what not were inherited from Hinduism and other local religions, including traditional Chinese religion and folklore, who elaborate on the scheme and bloat up the number of hell realms to the thousands (you gotta wonder what is going on with people when they come up with such elaborate tortures for other people…angry much?)

It is interesting though as it shows that our fascination with an unpleasant afterlife seems to be universal, even when it comes to a philosophy/religion that is all about peace and love.  I guess it goes to show that there is a dark side within all of us, even those in search of Enlightenment.


A Mindset of Forgiveness

The dove, a symbol of peaceRecently, a post on Facebook that one of my family members wrote got me thinking.  It was a question about forgiveness from a Christian perspective.  Basically, the Bible says that we must forgive those who wrong us, because if we don’t forgive then God won’t forgive us.  The question was, and I’m paraphrasing, “would it be a sin if I withheld forgiveness from someone who didn’t apologize or ask forgiveness for something they did to me?”

Now, I should point out here that I don’t see sin as a valid concept so the notion of whether something is a sin or not doesn’t matter much to me.  However, there are deeper questions implied by this question that I find to be more intriguing.  They hit right to the heart of how we conceive of forgiveness in our culture and in our daily lives.  One question is: “is forgiveness contingent upon the actions of the wrongdoer?”  Another involves an old cliche: “should I just forgive and forget?”

However, before we answer anyone’s questions, we ought to put this train in reverse and figure out what the heck the word “forgiveness” means. There seems to be an idea that forgiving and forgetting are synonymous, hence the old cliche I mentioned just a couple of sentences ago.  I think though that even a cursory glance at the notion makes it seem a bit silly.  I don’t know about you, but I’ve never been able to make myself forget something. It seems to be an entirely involuntary process, if it even happens at all. I should think that trying to forget something would involve repressing thoughts, and repressing thoughts leads to a whole host of problems, not to mention the fact that it makes the thoughts come back stronger.

Besides that, I can remember a lot of bad things that people have done to me, but at the same time I don’t feel any real resentment toward them for what they did.  However, I have seen instances where people have forgotten about what caused the enmity between them and someone else, and yet they still despise one another.  So, I think by this point it’s pretty obvious that forgiveness and forgetting are two separate things.

So, we know what forgiveness is not, but what is it? I believe that forgiveness is a mindset.  It isn’t something contingent upon the actions of another person, but rather it is an energy or a quality that is generated within and emanates from the mind (or if you prefer, the soul).  In this way, forgiveness is like compassion, and indeed I see it as another facet of compassion.  Forgiveness stems from seeing the other person as they really are – the result of their entire life up until that point, the sum total of their experiences and heritage (genetic, cultural, and familial) – and realizing that their actions stem from all of those influences.  Forgiveness also stems from having insight into ones self as well, and finally in seeing the similarity between yourself and that other person.

If one has this mindset, it doesn’t matter at all what the other person does.  A person with the mindset of forgiveness will simply let things go and wish the best for the person who wronged them.

No, Sir Mix-a-Lot, not that kind of big butt. Sorry :P

BUT.  I made that a big but for a reason.  I want to clarify a common misconception about forgiveness, one that I think is brought on by the error of “forgive and forget”.  Forgiving someone doesn’t mean you’re now best friends.  It doesn’t mean you have to be around the person (especially if that person is abusive), or that you even have to particularly like them.  What it means is that you have given up your resentment toward them, that you’ve made a decision that peace in your life is more important than nurturing anger and hurt.

Forgiveness also doesn’t mean a person shouldn’t be punished for something that they did wrong.  I might forgive someone for, say, striking me with their car and driving off, or breaking into my house, or mugging me.  However, I am still going to pursue charges if it comes to that.  Why?  Not out of retribution, but because that person and the rest of society needs to see that what they did was wrong.  It is meant to teach the person a lesson, so that they can hopefully make necessary changes in their lives so that what they did to me doesn’t happen again.  In extreme cases, a person might not be reformable, in which case they need to be locked away so that they can’t harm anyone else.  Whatever the case may be, seeking legal remedy and forgiving a person aren’t mutually exclusive.

So what do you think? Agree? Disagree? Have you’re own ideas? Comment below!


On Karma

Karma is a Buddhist and Hindu concept of cosmic retribution. At least, that is the version most people see; in reality it is simple cause and effect.My series Bizarre Buddhism has inspired me to start doing more posts about Buddhist philosophy.  It seems a fitting thing to do for Wednesdays, considering that’s a “whatever I feel like” kind of day.

Today I’m talking about Karma.  You hear an awful lot about karma, especially on Facebook.  You know what I’m talking about – you’ve seen the posts.  Usually they’re a passive aggressive rant about how a person has done the poster wrong and that the poster is going to stand their and laugh when karma comes around and bites them in the ass.

This is the most common view of karma, and the one that most people in the West are familiar with.  This is karma as a system of reward and punishment.  According to this system, if you do bad things then bad things come back to you, and if you do good things then good things come back to you.  The fact that my hypothetical poster above is gloating over the bad things that will befall their imaginary enemy shows they probably don’t understand a lot about the whole reward and punishment thing, as gloating over your enemy’s demise probably doesn’t do much for your karma.

Besides that, I think a just a cursory examination of the idea shows it to be little more than wishful thinking at best, and delusional at worst.  I don’t know about you, but I’ve known good people who can never catch a break, and I’ve seen bad people who never seem to hit a speed bump.  Just look at the Wall Street bankers, who stole billions of dollars from the American people and as of yet have not darkened the door of a prison.  According to karma as reward and punishment, those folks ought to be flipping burgers at some greasy spoon right now, wondering if they’ll even get their next paycheck.  That or they ought to be locked away in a federal, “best not drop the soap” prison for the rest of their miserable lives.

Proof that karma doesn’t exist? Well, maybe if he was a real banker :P

No, I think it’s pretty obvious to most that karma as a system of reward and punishment isn’t a valid concept.  So there’s the end of it.  Karma is bunk and you should ignore it…

…or is it?  Actually there is a subtler sort of karma that is, from a Buddhist perspective at least, valid.  This is karma as a mode of causality.  Karma is the engine that drives the universe, the motivating force for all phenomena in the world as we know it, including you and me.  It is in part at least responsible for the suffering in the world as well.

Whew!  Sounds like a pretty big and intimidating topic right?  It’s simpler than it sounds really.  Karma is nothing more than cause and effect.  Cause and effect is the thing that drives the universe, from a quantum level all the way up to the biggest scales imaginable.  Karma is responsible for everything that happens on every scale.

Now, there IS room for a sort of reward/punishment system like the one that I (eloquently, or I would like to imagine it that way, haha) poked holes in earlier in this idea of karma as cause and effect.  The logic goes something like this: if you do good things (you’re kind to people, you obey the law, whatever it may be), it is more likely that good things will happen back to you.  That is to say, you will avoid bad things happening (that are avoidable) and you will be more likely to receive kindness in turn from other people.  On the flip side, if you do bad things (smoke, drink to excess, being a giant throbbing prick to everyone you meet) then it is more likely that bad things will happen to you.  That is to say, you will have avoidable bad things (like going to jail, alcohol poisoning, etc) happen to you and people will be less likely to be kind to you.

You’ll notice that I said more likely a couple of times up there.  That’s to illustrate a bit of flawed thinking in the earlier, coarser version of this whole karma business: that it’s a tit for tat system of reward and punishment.  It often is thought of that way, but in reality karma is more of a momentum resulting from a mindset and from habit.  One white lie might be harmless, but being a pathological liar might get you in a whole host of trouble.   Holding a door for someone might not even earn a mumble of thanks, but a life of compassion and service could be a joy to you and a great help to countless others.

I also want to point out something painfully obvious (again): bad things happen.  They DO result from karma, in the sense of cause and effect, but they don’t NECESSARILY follow from our own actions.  If a tornado swoops in and blows your house off your hinges, it isn’t your fault.  If you’re driving along and get whalloped by a drunk driver, it isn’t because you did something bad.  Things just happen, and they happen for a whole host of reasons. Some we bring on ourselves, and some things we could never predict.  How we can relate this idea of karma on the level of our own lives is to look deeply into our thoughts, speech, actions, habits, and character and see how all of these things interact to nudge our lives down the course it is taking, and then start to make necessary changes to put our lives on the track it needs to be on.

Whew! Still with me? Almost done..I promise. Although the worst has yet to come…so hold on tight!

What I just got done describing is karma on a slightly less coarse level.  A deeper look at karma reveals more about how the universe works on a fundamental level.  Karma is said to drive samsara or the endless cycle of suffering.  One could look at samsara on a universal scale, in terms of the cycle of birth and rebirth.  I don’t comment on such things because I don’t see them as particularly relevant to life and happiness.  I tend to look at samsara on a smaller scale, on the scale of individual lives.

If you look at karma and samsara on that scale, it can help you look more deeply into the suffering in your own life, to get a grasp on its nature and try to find a way to root it out.

With that in mind, let’s look at how karma can reveal one of the deepest concepts of Buddhist philosophy (and also the most confusing), a concept that can reveal the true nature of the universe and one’s self, and a concept that can help one gain a deeper understanding of their suffering in order to root it out.  This is the philosophy of “emptiness”.

Let’s look at this in terms of karma (don’t worry though – this is a mind bending topic and I intend to devote an entire post to it later, so hopefully it will be more clear after that.)  Karma is cause and effect.  A cause is not a cause unless it has an effect.  Also, an effect is not an effect unless it is caused by something.  A cause cannot exist without its effect (because then it would not be a cause), and an effect cannot exist without its cause (because then it would not be an effect).

So, cause and effect depend on one another.  They are what is called in Buddhism a “dependent arising”.  They do not exist in and of themselves (a state of being called “inherent existence”) but rather depend on one another to exist.  They are considered to be empty of inherent existence because of this fact.  It can also be described by the term interrelatedness.

It might seem rather simple on the surface, but I’m going to go further to say that everything is “empty” in the sense that I described above. That includes you, me, your mom, the pets, and everyone and everything else in the entire universe.  I’m thinking that one of these days, when I have the mental energy to do so, I’ll devote an entire post to emptiness: what it is, how it relates to our lives, and how the concept of emptiness helps to relieve psychological suffering (and what is meant by the word “suffering” in Buddhism).  For now though, you know everything you ever wanted to know (and probably a ton you didn’t) about Karma!


Bizarre Buddhism–Sokushinbutsu: The Mummy Monks

Sokushinbutsu were the result of a sect of Japanese buddhists - the Shugendo -  who believed they could achieve living Buddhahood by an elaborate process of self mummification.  The sect is now outlawed in Japan.

One of the Sokushinbutsu

How far would you go for your beliefs?  If your faith called for it, would you give up your life?  What if, to get to heaven, you were called upon to take your OWN life?

Sound bizarre? To a sect of Buddhists called Shugendo it certainly wasn’t.  These monks and nuns are known now as the Sokushinbutsu, and are considered “living” buddhas (seems odd to call them living, but whatever).  They went through a long, painful process in order to preserve their bodies and achieve Buddhahood and the state of Nirvana.  To put it in Western terms, they mummified themselves alive in order to go to Heaven.

You might be thinking right now about the Egyptian mummification process, and wondering how in the heck someone could do something like that to themselves (the why might be understandable…after all, eternal peace and happiness is a pretty powerful motivator, although I should add that the Buddhist idea of ‘heaven’ is a lot different than what we think of here in America.)

The mummification process in this instance is a lot different than that practiced by the Egyptians.  Fundamentally different, in fact, because the Sokushinbutsu literally attempted to mummify themselves alive, while the Egyptians did their process post-mortem and, obviously, to another person.

A mummified monk - a Sokushinbutsu

One of the “living” Buddhas. He’s looking pretty spry for his age…

So how was this self-mummification achieved?  The first step of the process lasted 1000 days.  During this time, the aspiring Sokushinbutsu would eat a special diet of nuts and seeds while participating in a rigorous exercise routine in order to strip fat from their body.  In the second step of the process, the monk would only eat bark and roots for 1000 days.  Also during this time, they would consume a poisonous tea made from the sap of the Urushi tree, a sap normally used to make lacquer for bowls.  This tea caused vomiting and diarrhea, which resulted in rapid weight loss. Most importantly though, compounds in the sap made the body poisonous to maggots, which is obviously a good thing if you’re trying to keep the little critters from eating your corpse.

Once the second phase was done, the emaciated and sickly monk would enter a tomb crafted to be barely bigger than his body.  He would assume the lotus posture, which he would not move from for the rest of his life.  He would be sealed into the tomb, his only contact with the outside world a small air tube and a bell.  Every day for the rest of his life, he would ring the bell to let those outside know he was still alive.

When the bell stopped ringing, those attending the monk through his self mummification process would seal up the tomb completely and leave it sealed for another 1000 days.  Once the 1000 days were past, they would open up the tomb and see if the would be Sokushinbutsu had achieved his aim of self mummification.  Most times, they would open the tomb and find a rotted corpse.  A few times though, the process worked and the corpse was fairly well preserved (although not quite as well as Egyptian mummies and not near as well as bog mummies.)

A skeletal mummy

This guy looks a little worse for wear. Not sure if he is considered a Sokushinbutsu or not…

Those who tried and failed this bizarre and painful process were respected for their devotion, but those who became Sokushinbutsu were immediately venerated as a ‘living’ Buddha and put on display for all to see.

Thankfully, this bizarre practice has not survived the test of time.  The process was outlawed in 1879 in Japan, and for good measure now any kind of assisted suicide, including suicides for religious reasons, are now illegal.

I feel obligated to point out the obvious here.  This was NOT what the Buddha intended, and I seriously doubt he would approve had he lived long enough to see this process take place.  As I’ve said before, the Buddha tried the whole “extreme self denial to achieve Enlightenment” thing and it didn’t work out too well for him.  Luckily he stopped it before he died of starvation or sickness.

No, what the Shugendo sect did was not in keeping with the Buddhist philosophy as it was meant to be practiced. It was one of those extreme sects – every religion/philosophy has them – and they don’t really reflect the views of the wider community well at all.

That being said, right or wrong, this is a part of history.  The Sokushinbutsu show just how far people will go in pursuit of a belief, misguided or otherwise, and serve as a shining example of just how bizarre Buddhism can be.


Bizarre Buddhism–Preface

A brief outline of the Buddhist philosophy

An image of the Buddha.

Like anyone else who is faithful, I’m very interested in learning more about my faith.  Unlike many people who are faithful, I have a penchant for the bizarre.  So, in that spirit, I decided to investigate bizarre stories, practices, and customs of Buddhism.  I should clarify–I’m a philosophical Buddhist, not a religious one. So I don’t take the old stories literally, but rather look at the teachings as a guide to life. That was the Buddha’s intent, but as we will see that intent became distorted over time as his followers began to take the stories a mite too literally, not to mention that they mixed in some of their own.

Here in the West, the word Buddhism brings to mind images of peaceful monks who speak in riddles and wear awesome robes.  And rightfully so – it’s a largely monastic religion/philosophy with a penchant for poetry and prose that (intentionally) flummox the thought processes.  Also, people on this side of the pond think of Buddhists as enlightened and largely rational if a bit mystic around the edges (you of course get the crazy fundies/atheists who respectively call us idolaters/practitioners of an evil faith, but no one really listens to them so they don’t count for all that much.)

With those thoughts in mind, and knowing what I do of the heart and soul of the Buddha’s teachings, I thought it might be interesting to see how real practice diverges from the perception and the ideal.  Keep in mind that any religion or philosophy is filtered through the cultural lens of its practitioners.  And,  like any ideas, they can evolve over time, sometimes to the point they would be nigh unrecognizable to early proponents.

That being said, Buddhism is at least 2500 years old.  It sprang from the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama, better known as the Buddha, who based many of his ideas on Hindu practices.  The Buddha was born royalty.  It was prophesied that he would either become a great teacher or a great leader.  His father, a king concerned with leaving a legacy, naturally wished for the latter.  To see that it happened, he sheltered his son and gave in to his every whim.

It might seem surprising to some to hear this, but the Buddha lived in decadence and hedonism for a good portion of his life.  He didn’t find any of this fulfilling though, nor did he find it fulfilling when he settled down with a wife and had a child.

This lack of fulfillment came to a head when, one day, the bubble he’d lived in his entire life was popped.  For the first time in his life, he encountered true suffering – he saw a sick man on the side of the road, an old man, and a dead man.  These things struck him hard, and they would change the course of his life and ultimately the course of history.  They lead him to ask a very deep question – why is there suffering in the world?  He forsook the life he had lived and become an ascetic, traveling in search of Enlightenment and an answer to his question.

Like anything worth having though, Enlightenment wasn’t something easy to come by.  He practiced all sorts of odd things in his search, most of them pretty unpleasant.  He would often go days only eating a few scraps of rice, the idea being that forsaking physical things would lead to spiritual Enlightenment.   He almost starved himself, and still found no answer to his question.

The Buddha was not satisfied, and after feeding himself and earning the ire of his fellow practitioners, he sat down at the foot of a Bhodi tree and determined that he would not rise again until he had answered his question.

A scene of the Buddha's Enlightenment.

An image of Buddha under the Bhodi tree.

It was then that, according to the stories, Mara appeared with a legion of demons to sow doubt in the Buddha’s heart.  Mara is the equivalent of Satan in Buddhist mythology.  Also, I should note that not ALL of this story is taken literally by most Buddhists.  Sure, you have fundamentalists and what not, but a good many of us recognize the story for what it is – allegory.  Mara and the demons represent the Buddha’s doubts and fears, nothing more.

Anyway, the Buddha fended off all of the demonic attacks by maintaining his meditative focus.  At one point, it was said that the legion of demons fired a volley of flaming arrows at the Buddha, and that when they came near him they burst into clouds of flower petals.  When the Buddha was close to Enlightenment, Mara threw what amounted to a Hail Mary pass, saying (and I’m paraphrasing here), that with no witnesses around that no one would believe him.  The Buddha didn’t say a word, but rather touched the earth with two fingers, as if to say the earth and all the universe bore witness to his Enlightenment.  Mara and his legion of demons disappeared, replaced by a  burst of greenery and flowers.  It was said that at that moment the Bhodi also burst into life, and that its shadow remained fixed in place to provide shade for the newly minted Buddha.

As you can see, Buddhism has some pretty rich (and admittedly odd) stories.  Most are taken strictly allegorically by monks and laypeople, but really it depends on where you go.  Buddhism spread from India all the way to Japan and everywhere in between.  Many times it was assimilated into existing belief systems, and other times it assimilated existing belief systems into itself, like Christianity did in Europe.

That being said, I want to briefly point out the heart of the teachings, both because I feel they are important (I’m biased, what can I say?) and because it will give some context to future posts in the series.

The Buddha realized that he had lived in two extremes.  First he had lived a life of materialism, where he indulged his every desire.  It did not relieve his suffering, which spurred him to swing to the next extreme, that of denial.  Denying his desires completely, to the point of nearly killing himself, also didn’t relieve his suffering.  He realized that his answer lay between the two extremes, in the Middle Way.

This realization stemmed from a more fundamental one – the answer to the question that made him leave his home several years before and take up the life of an ascetic.  He realized that suffering is a part of life.  It is the nature of all things to decay, to pass away, and to end.  This is the result of living in a world driven by karmic forces (karma meaning cause/effect, not the system of reward/punishment we often associate with it.)

The Dharmachakra – each spoke represents a facet of the Eight Fold Path

From this realization came an even finer realization, which resulted in the Four Noble Truths and the Eight Fold path.  All sentient beings seek happiness and seek to avoid suffering.  However, in doing so they often bring more suffering onto themselves.  Why is that?  Because of ignorance, or more accurately misperception.  They perceive an object as existing inherently (existing in and of itself, as if it is above the processes of karma and decay I talked about above) and from this misperception, they exaggerate its good or bad qualities.  The fundamental misperception balloons into negative emotions of one sort or another, and then leads to suffering.

The Middle Way is the confluence of the philosophy of Emptiness, the Four Noble Truths, and the Eight Fold Path.  It seeks to see reality clearly, to root out mental suffering at its core and bring peace to the practitioner.

And that is a way, way too brief primer on the core of Buddhist thought (in future series, I may go into detail about each part. For now, follow the links if you are curious!)  We will see in coming weeks how those basic principles molded and meshed with local customs and different schools of thought to produce some very strange practices and beliefs.  Come with me and journey into the bizarre confluence of religion, culture, and mysticism that is Bizarre Buddhism!


%d bloggers like this: